Username:    Password:    Remember Me?         

Decisive Force? - Reverie World Studios Forums

Go Back   Reverie World Studios Forums > Kingdom Wars > Public Suggestions and Proposals
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-27-2009, 03:55 PM
Darvin's Avatar
Darvin Darvin is offline
Reverie Super Moderator - RTSCommunity.com Ambassador
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 666
Darvin is just really niceDarvin is just really niceDarvin is just really nice
Default Decisive Force?

Perhaps it's still somewhat premature, but there's one itching question I have about this game: how is it going to handle decisive force?

In most games, you get exponential returns in combat. If you send 10 of your units to attack 10 enemies (presuming all other things equal) it will come down to the last man. However, send 15 guys to attack the smaller force of 10, and chances are you'll have more than 5 units left over. In fact, in many games you might take only 2 or 3 losses. Putting more units into a single fight gives you a decisive edge.

Now, I've always found this bad for gameplay, and somewhat unrealistic. If World War I taught us anything, charging twice as many soldiers into machine gun fire just gets twice as many soldiers killed. Napoleon's grand strategy was "divide and conquer" not "advance as a single decisive force and conquer". There's also a certain matter of those Spartans at Thermopylae, who certainly weren't too disadvantaged by their numerical situation. Gameplay-wise, it leads to situations where you feel forced to keep your army in one big group, limiting your strategic options to subdivide your forces, and also makes it very hard to make a comeback if you have a numerical disadvantage ("steamroller" effect).

So, I'm wondering if DoF has any ace up its sleeve to deal with the issues of decisiveness? Will there be ways to make smaller forces more effective and less risky propositions, and be able to appropriate match (or at least delay) larger forces without just getting crushed by sheer numerical advantage?
__________________
----------------------------------------------
www.RTSCommunity.com
----------------------------------------------
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-27-2009, 07:04 PM
Feweh Feweh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 168
Feweh has fair reputation
Default

For some reason i highly doubt it,

but i know exactly what your saying.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-27-2009, 08:47 PM
Darvin's Avatar
Darvin Darvin is offline
Reverie Super Moderator - RTSCommunity.com Ambassador
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 666
Darvin is just really niceDarvin is just really niceDarvin is just really nice
Default

Quote:
For some reason i highly doubt it,
Same; why do you think I put this topic in the "suggestions" forum?
__________________
----------------------------------------------
www.RTSCommunity.com
----------------------------------------------
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-27-2009, 09:45 PM
The_Biz The_Biz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 105
The_Biz has a default reputation
Default

there's nothing unbalanced with having 15vs.10 and having 10 left over.

that's how combat works in almost all games
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-27-2009, 11:48 PM
Darvin's Avatar
Darvin Darvin is offline
Reverie Super Moderator - RTSCommunity.com Ambassador
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 666
Darvin is just really niceDarvin is just really niceDarvin is just really nice
Default

This topic isn't about balance whatsoever. This topic is about gameplay mechanics. Just because other games do it that way doesn't mean it should be that way. As I stated in my original post, there are numerous gameplay reasons why this isn't favourable.

First, you have the steamroller effect, where if you lose one major battle it's effectively impossible to recover because the enemy's force is so large that you cannot raise a comparable one that can even slow it down. Secondly, you have the issue that the need for decisive force prevents you from splitting up your army, reducing tactical options (ie, divide and conquer).
__________________
----------------------------------------------
www.RTSCommunity.com
----------------------------------------------
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-28-2009, 10:23 AM
Joseph Visscher's Avatar
Joseph Visscher Joseph Visscher is offline
Reverie World Studios - Lead Level Designer, Senior Gameplay Programmer, 3D Animator, 3D-2D Artist.
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Canada B.C.
Posts: 1,279
Joseph Visscher has extremely good reputationJoseph Visscher has extremely good reputationJoseph Visscher has extremely good reputationJoseph Visscher has extremely good reputation
Default

DOF's combat is quite different, it is more RPG style than any other rts I've seen. If you have 2 v 1 soldiers of the exact same type, rank, research, armor, stance, and ability then those 2 soldiers will take turns attacking the lonely soldier, all he can really do is block the attacks, his chances of attacking back will be reduced as he has to block more attacks.

Out numbering your enemy is a pretty good tactic, but doesn't always work if he uses archers correctly and you don't spread out your troops, well that machine gun tactic will come into play ; you must also take skill level of your units and his.
The rank and skill of your units has a large impact on combat, it could be very easy to recreate a "300" moment with high ranking units blocking a small pathway with hundreds of unranked and unskilled enemies.
__________________
Joseph B. Visscher - JBV3737

Bugs aren't the problem, figuring out how to fix them is.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-28-2009, 11:54 AM
fyro11 fyro11 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Essex, England
Posts: 143
fyro11 has a default reputation
Default

If this is about guerilla and stealth warfare, then I'm all for it. As a lot of us know, BFME2 attempted this with stealth units, the Elves being the major faction. However the game mostly functions on harassment, rushes and largescale assaults. There is little more to it. The stealth just didn't operate effectively, and seemed like a sloppy job.

This game definitely looks more dynamic, and could make good use of guerilla warfare, imo.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-28-2009, 01:35 PM
Lordadamar Lordadamar is offline
Human Sect:
Swordsman
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 97
Lordadamar has a default reputation
Default

I think if you compare this to ME2TW for the mechanics you might be close Its not necessarily the amount of units its the training or upgrades your units have vs your opponents. Assumeing DoF has unit upgrade trees.

I have taken 1200 troops against 2000 and won several times, It takes strategy and a awareness both of which you hope your opponents lacks.

Personally I think stealth should be limit to natural surrounding like trees rocks, etc. in ME2TW you gain a certain amount of stealth by keeping you units in wooded areas...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-14-2009, 01:49 PM
THYMOLE THYMOLE is offline
Human Sect:
Peasant
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 7
THYMOLE has a default reputation
Default

So soldiers actually think instead of running through an attack animation?

Excellent....
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-14-2009, 03:15 PM
Darathor Darathor is offline
Elven Sect:
Treant
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 856
Darathor is someone to look uptoDarathor is someone to look upto
Default

It's really unique that blocking doesn't let your unit attack nearly as much, it sounds as if it will make it more realistic. If your fighting two people, you will block more often the you attack if around the same skill. It seems like it will give the advantage more often to orcs over elves(and humans to a lesser extent) as they likely outnumber other armies.
__________________

Picture made by Aametherar the orc (Elves are the best!)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:34 PM.

ESRB Rated T
US/CANADA
PEGI 16
EUROPE
USK 16
GERMANY

privacy policy   |   Copyright © Reverie World Studios INC.

Kingdom Wars and Reverie World Studios are trademarks of Reverie World Studios, Inc. Developed by Reverie World Studios, inc. All Rights Reserved. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.