Bridge !

[Paffp]

Originally Posted by Rhino

Does that not make the game more diverse and interesting? Isn't that what you want a game to be like? In my opinion if a game is not original and just some copy of another then 99% of the time it is just complete rubbish. Adding features that will make the game more original attracts more customers. Bridges are a great idea as they can create many different tactical scenarios.

Yes it does, it is allready interesting, I do hope its going to be an amasing game

[Bamboocha]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UypXbeb4jF4

shows some bridges in the video, is this an hint?

[elcooleo248]

Originally Posted by Staufftw

I don't know how it work at this moment in game, but it will be realy nice to see buildable/destroyable bridges ! I think about spot where you can build/repair it.
(Some bridges need to be unbreakable, like the one at castle door).

Very much agree with an entirely destructible atmosphere

[Khan kreiger]

Originally Posted by Bamboocha

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UypXbeb4jF4

shows some bridges in the video, is this an hint?

LMFAO....you do realize that, that is oooold. Reverieworld studios has come a long waay from that. But they are still in development so they could possibly put some kind of bridge building in.

[LiTos456]

Lol, it's funny how you guys take everything as a hint, no matter where you found it or how old it is :P There are bridges in the game, but I can't comment on whether you can build them yourself or destroy them yet.

[Tibador]

Not just bridges but lookout towers travelling hunting parties that provide food/resources to the city would be awesome to have those types of things be stratigic targets.

[myashin]

Originally Posted by Rhino

just wondering if there was some sort of siege tower device but used to get across rivers. Like a portable bridge. Instead of the top just coming down to go on a wall, the whole front lowers itself so men can cross a bridge. I think that would be something really cool.

as noted above,but what if we could lay ladders on to rivers or ravines to get over them, though it could help get past only for infantry i think, would apreciate someones thoughts on it

[Loose Morals]

im not sure i like the idea of being able to make a single bridge as tjhe only point of attack on your city. as a defence its too powerful. everyone would do it. there would be no personal touches or inovative defence. everyone makes one bridge and puts all defences around it. sounds kinda boring to me

[boondock5aint]

i like the idea of being able to build and destroy bridges from time to time, just simply for the fact i like being able to do more with the land in an rts other than just the town itself. The more i can build or modify to my liking the happier i am basically :P

[om3n]

I think it would be neat to see some form of siege construction/destruction along those lines. you could have defenders trying to take out bridges to create bottlenecks or attackers creating makeshift bridges to prevent one and give another avenue of approach(through use of nearby resources, trees etc). Just my two cents though i suppose.