|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
you develop it from HIV and it is given to you by either blood or sex. Anyways disease system will probably never come true anytime soon in a strategy game...
__________________
One day, someone showed me a glass of water that was half full. And he said, "Is it half full or half empty?" So I drank the water. No more problem. ~Alexander Jodorowsky |
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
Blackfang's point is good -I don't think disease is something that can practically be used as a weapon at this point [excluding orc cattle catapult thingy]. Maybe for the expansion. sigh. Iam tired.
|
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think disease would be good for this game, but you should limit it to decreased worker effectiveness or something similar.
|
|
#34
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well it would stand to reason that after having half the city trashed it would take a while to rebuild/repair. I would think that would really limit production/efficiency.
|
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
|
i agree, however i don't think they should make it a very effective form of devastation to the other player, a subtle form of hinder, maybe fatigue, or loss of some troops, nothing to dramatic
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|