Abadoned Buildings

[The Witch King of Angmar]

Originally Posted by kostiak

when you play multi in like 3v3 - one of your enemys is defeated.. you can bring a worker to his base and destroy his buildings for resources...

thats my suggestion

If he is defeated wouldn't his buildings be gone already? And why use a worker when you can use an army to destroy it faster?

[Kostia Kaploon]

Originally Posted by The Witch King of Angmar

If he is defeated wouldn't his buildings be gone already? And why use a worker when you can use an army to destroy it faster?

it wont neceserily be defeated because:

1 he can just surrender
2 you dont have to destroy all the walls and houses for example

you use a worker because with a worker you get resources per building you destroy - with an army you get nothing..

kost.

[The Witch King of Angmar]

Originally Posted by kostiak

it wont neceserily be defeated because:

1 he can just surrender
2 you dont have to destroy all the walls and houses for example

you use a worker because with a worker you get resources per building you destroy - with an army you get nothing..

kost.

Ok I get you now. But if he surrnedered would he just be out of the game?

PS Instead of destroying the buildings he should loot them or get resources from them.

[Kostia Kaploon]

Originally Posted by The Witch King of Angmar

Ok I get you now. But if he surrnedered would he just be out of the game?

PS Instead of destroying the buildings he should loot them or get resources from them.

i dont know about surrender.. ur probably right.. well thats the looting/geting resources..
like if a house is made out of wood - we would take it apart and take all the useable wood..
so basicly it is looting..

[ShadowyMoon]

It is looting but it would make the player/team that's winning have even more of an advantage.

[The Witch King of Angmar]

Originally Posted by ShadowyMoon

It is looting but it would make the player/team that's winning have even more of an advantage.

Yeah the other team mate should be able to loot thier partners buildings instead.

[Kostia Kaploon]

Originally Posted by The Witch King of Angmar

Yeah the other team amte should be able to loot thier partners buildings instead.

maybe a first come first serve kind of thing? (one more thing to fight over..)

[Andreas Hollandt]

Originally Posted by The Witch King of Angmar

Yeah the other team amte should be able to loot thier partners buildings instead.

Seems to be a good idea.

Originally Posted by kostiak

maybe a first come first serve kind of thing? (one more thing to fight over..)

but the team with the missing player is already battered, how shall they fight?

[Kostia Kaploon]

not once did i see a good player win 3-4 in a row.. but now that i think about it the players in the mmo are matched by rank (meaning they are about the same level). But i see no problem in using it in skirmishes. Maybe have it as an option for the host to deside.

kost.

[Puppeteer]

Looting would be a good idea, maybe have workers or armies looting buildings. Armies would be quick and get less resources, whereas workers know what to look out for so get more resources.