Reverie World Studios Forums

Reverie World Studios Forums (http://www.reverieworld.com/forums/index.php)
-   Public Suggestions and Proposals (http://www.reverieworld.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   PvP ranking (http://www.reverieworld.com/forums/showthread.php?t=4835)

grumil 10-31-2011 12:41 AM

PvP ranking
 
A PvP ranking that only counts the crowns win on PvP battles, could be something like R.U.S.E. game ranking.

This encourage players to fight on pvp and recruit better and larger armies for biggeer battles, because bigger battles give more crowns that little ones.

And another idea is to give more crowns to the attacker than to the defender if wins the battle, for example a 20% more crowns.

andreicde 10-31-2011 06:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by grumil (Post 65383)
A PvP ranking that only counts the crowns win on PvP battles, could be something like R.U.S.E. game ranking.

This encourage players to fight on pvp and recruit better and larger armies for biggeer battles, because bigger battles give more crowns that little ones.

And another idea is to give more crowns to the attacker than to the defender if wins the battle, for example a 20% more crowns.

actually I wouldn't encourage larger battles.Right now larger battles=larger exp lag feast.So smaller battles are more recommended to avoid the massive lag.

Konstantin Fomenko 10-31-2011 08:44 AM

We actually have a huge PvP ranking and player profile window in the works - so we got this covered.

As for attackers getting more Influence over Defenders - we did consider this, but it seems to discourage players from accepting PvP invitations - everyone would rather attack and not defend:)

grumil 10-31-2011 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Konstantin Fomenko (Post 65414)
As for attackers getting more Influence over Defenders - we did consider this, but it seems to discourage players from accepting PvP invitations - everyone would rather attack and not defend:)

The fact is that is easier to defend than to attack, and defender just need to wait until the attacker makes his move, if attacker dont move, after 20 minutes defender wins, or i think so.

My experience is that i fougth near 50 battles with my new city, and i only was attacked 4 or 5 times. I think people prefer defend than attack, because, as i said, is easier.

The idea is give big prize for an attacker victory because that is a harder victory.

Konstantin Fomenko 10-31-2011 06:18 PM

You know you actually bring up a good point! But we do want to see how things will go with Army vs Town PvP first. I do agree defender is much better off - however - consider enemy army attacking your town - even if you win the battle - you`ll have a lot of damage in your castle, so it kind of seems fare.

andreicde 10-31-2011 10:30 PM

o.O I don't know you but I'm scared to log in my elf account,so that the wrong army wouldn't get attacked.Not afraid to lose units,but I fear for the sake of my haunter drag+ usually i end up getting attacked in a range of 10-20 min after I go in.It might be just me though.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:45 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2001-2011 Reverie World Studios INC. All Rights Reserved.