PDA

View Full Version : make knights to dismount


andreicde
10-07-2011, 10:11 AM
I know it sounds like a funny suggestion,but I hate when you have the situation of armies with no siege getting set against fort armies and you have no melee left and the oponent garrison units in towers.It's such a game breaking specially since you can't reach them because they can just hide

Also in the same thread I want to suggest the pvp to be changed.I hate when someone without siege weapons gets put against someone with fortified camp.It should be either camps against camps,camps against army with siege or army without siege vs army without siege. If I would be prepared with siege I should have priority over camps instead of normal army.Same thing for the army without siege. It's not much of a strategy when you can end up against a type of battle where you have a huge disadvantage.At least if we knew what type of battle it was it would make sense. in reality I wouldn't engage against a fort if I don't have the necessary troops to siege a fort.

White935
10-07-2011, 10:21 AM
an alternative could be to make it possible to build siege equipment on the battlefield no? like assemble it from your starting point. mayby make battering ram free or something so that you can -always. use a minimal siege tool.

ps: allowing units to dismound is a great idea, thought it might be hard to implement i figure.

andreicde
10-07-2011, 10:31 AM
an alternative could be to make it possible to build siege equipment on the battlefield no? like assemble it from your starting point. mayby make battering ram free or something so that you can -always. use a minimal siege tool.

ps: allowing units to dismound is a great idea, thought it might be hard to implement i figure.

that too.The idea to make camp to be able to make siege engines is great,except it only works on the map and by the time you're in pvp and you realize you're against a camp,you can't do anything

White935
10-07-2011, 10:36 AM
that too.The idea to make camp to be able to make siege engines is great,except it only works on the map and by the time you're in pvp and you realize you're against a camp,you can't do anything

Camps can make siege engines atm On the world map. i spoke of making it Ingame in PvP aslong as your armies atleast has supplies on itself. ( aka 200 wood 100 gold). From the Spawning area ( just add a tent(s) instead of a pallisade wall (for camps)

Firetongue
10-07-2011, 11:15 AM
That all mounted units must be able to dismount is a fact, it might be hard to implement, yet in the long run it is a musthave thing.


But the fact that you might find someone inside of a fortified camp when you're searching for pvp, and you might not have brought any sige weapons is only you're own fault. The fact that you're opponent made sure to be ready for an eventual attack by making a fortification yet u where not ready to face a fortification is realy just though luck for you, be prepared next time you look for a fight.

But on the other hand people can now make fortified camps, then attack other players from the camp. This is ridiculous, if you fortify you're army you should not be able to attack other players, only be attacked. Or if you attack another player you're camp should be removed.

andreicde
10-07-2011, 11:18 AM
That all mounted units must be able to dismount is a fact, it might be hard to implement, yet in the long run it is a musthave thing.


But the fact that you might find someone inside of a fortified camp when you're searching for pvp, and you might not have brought any sige weapons is only you're own fault. The fact that you're opponent made sure to be ready for an eventual attack by making a fortification yet u where not ready to face a fortification is realy just though luck for you, be prepared next time you look for a fight.

But on the other hand people can now make fortified camps, then attack other players from the camp. This is ridiculous, if you fortify you're army you should not be able to attack other players, only be attacked. Or if you attack another player you're camp should be removed.

hm I agree with that.If you use fortified cap or even a camp you shouldn't be able to attack others.I mean how can you att if you are in a camp?a camp wouldn't actually teleport magically near an enemy

White935
10-07-2011, 11:18 AM
That all mounted units must be able to dismount is a fact, it might be hard to implement, yet in the long run it is a musthave thing.


But the fact that you might find someone inside of a fortified camp when you're searching for pvp, and you might not have brought any sige weapons is only you're own fault. The fact that you're opponent made sure to be ready for an eventual attack by making a fortification yet u where not ready to face a fortification is realy just though luck for you, be prepared next time you look for a fight.

But on the other hand people can now make fortified camps, then attack other players from the camp. This is ridiculous, if you fortify you're army you should not be able to attack other players, only be attacked. Or if you attack another player you're camp should be removed.

i agree with the fact, that you shouldnt be able to search for pvp with being in a camp.

Valkyrie
10-07-2011, 11:59 AM
But on the other hand people can now make fortified camps, then attack other players from the camp. This is ridiculous, if you fortify you're army you should not be able to attack other players, only be attacked. Or if you attack another player you're camp should be removed.

Stop screwing with my battle tactics!!

but ye knights should be able to dismount, also if they want to mount again they have to run back to thier horses(you should make horses killable just for the lulz).

andreicde
10-07-2011, 03:59 PM
Stop screwing with my battle tactics!!

but ye knights should be able to dismount, also if they want to mount again they have to run back to thier horses(you should make horses killable just for the lulz).

lol but it would be fun! as long as hero's horse can't be killed.You don't want to lose that speedy tough horse you just paid 50 wealth on or that took you hours to find while questing

Valkyrie
10-07-2011, 04:39 PM
lol but it would be fun! as long as hero's horse can't be killed.You don't want to lose that speedy tough horse you just paid 50 wealth on or that took you hours to find while questing


haha if someone had to pay 50 wealth for his hero to get a horse i would aim that horse with all i got everytime i saw one, just to annoy people.

Dreamwalker
10-07-2011, 08:18 PM
haha if someone had to pay 50 wealth for his hero to get a horse i would aim that horse with all i got everytime i saw one, just to annoy people.

People pay 50 wealth for a horse?:eek: Yeah, I get that's it an advantage, but still.

Anyway, I agree with the whole dismounting/pvp thing. A problem with most of these kind of games is that there is never dismounting (or almost never, anyway); so if your infantry are dead and you need to climb walls, you're screwed.

As for attacking camps without siege, that's something that should get patched up pretty quickly (if we're lucky;) ).